Massive Backlash Over Anti-Corruption Law
On July 22, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed a highly controversial bill that reshapes the country's anti-corruption framework, placing the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) under the direct control of the Prosecutor General's Office. This move has ignited widespread outrage among Ukrainian citizens and officials, marking the first significant protests against Zelenskyy's government since Russia's full-scale invasion began in 2022. Critics argue that the law undermines the independence of these agencies, which were established post-2014 revolution to combat high-level corruption.
The protests in Kyiv and other parts of Ukraine have drawn thousands to the streets, with many expressing concern that this legislative change could signal a rollback of democratic reforms. The timing of the law, amid an ongoing war, has only heightened tensions, as citizens fear it could weaken Ukraine's institutional integrity at a critical juncture. Reports indicate that demonstrators view this as a potential power grab, masked as a wartime reform measure.
EU Concerns and Implications for Accession
The European Union has voiced significant alarm over the new law, warning that it could jeopardize Ukraine's path to EU membership. The European Commission has emphasized that maintaining the independence of anti-corruption bodies like NABU and SAPO is one of the seven key conditions for Ukraine's accession process. Officials in Brussels have stated that this move threatens not only Ukraine's commitment to rule-of-law reforms but also the financial aid tied to these reforms.
Zelenskyy has defended the legislation, asserting that it aims to strengthen national institutions by removing external influences, particularly those linked to Russia. He has also indicated a willingness to propose a new law to restore the agencies' independence following the public outcry. However, skepticism remains among EU representatives and Ukrainian activists about whether such a reversal will fully address the damage done to public trust and international perception.
Domestic and International Reactions
Domestically, the law has faced sharp criticism from anti-corruption watchdogs and civil society groups who see it as a direct attack on years of progress in combating graft. The decision to grant the Prosecutor General—often seen as politically aligned with the government—oversight over NABU and SAPO has fueled fears of politicized investigations and case interference. Many Ukrainians worry that this could deter whistleblowers and hinder efforts to hold powerful figures accountable.
Internationally, the response has been equally critical, with posts on social media platforms reflecting a mix of concern and condemnation. The global spotlight on Ukraine, already intense due to the war, has intensified as observers question whether this law aligns with the democratic values Zelenskyy has championed. As protests continue and discussions unfold, the balance between national security needs and democratic principles remains a contentious issue for Ukraine's future.